<listing id="lr5m0"></listing>
      <del id="lr5m0"></del>

      <del id="lr5m0"></del>

      1. 甘肅政法學院學報

        2007, No.93(04) 5-21

        [打印本頁] [關閉]
        本期目錄 | 過刊瀏覽 | 高級檢索

        作為過錯侵權責任構成要件的非法性與過錯——我國過錯侵權責任制度應當采取的規則
        The Illegality and Fault of the Components of the Liability for Fault Tort——Rules that Liability System of Fault Tort Should Adopt in China

        張民安;

        摘要:

        非法性同過錯的區分原則僅僅是少數國家的法律所規定的現象,大多數國家的侵權法認為過錯同非法行為是內涵和外延等同的概念;過錯實際上是一種注意義務的違反行為,是一種非法行為;將非法行為看作過錯之外的獨立構成要件既違反了我國《民法通則》的明確規定,也違反了民法所貫徹的法典內在平衡的公共政策,還違反了當代侵權法的發展潮流;廢除主觀過錯理論,確立客觀過錯理論是我國未來侵權法應當堅持的重要原則。

        關鍵詞: 非法性;主觀過錯;客觀過錯;責任構成要件

        Abstract: The distinguishing principle between illegality and fault is only a law phenomenon in minority countries;fault and unlawful acts are the same concepts of intension and extension in majority countries;in fact fault is the breach of that duty,which is an unlawful act,thus it violates not only the general principles of civil law but also internal trimmed public policy of the civil law and even the development of the tort law in the modern society.Therefore it is an important principle for the tort law to abolish the subjective fault theory and establish objective fault theory.

        Keywords: illegality;subjective fault;objective fault;the components of the liability

        基金項目:

        通訊作者:

        Email:

        參考文獻:

        擴展功能
        本文信息
        服務與反饋
        本文關鍵詞相關文章
        本文作者相關文章
        中國知網
        宾利棋牌